Lick Paint review: It’s my new favourite paint brand – here’s why

This article provides a comprehensive, hands-on review of Lick paint, highlighting its performance, characteristics, and value compared to other brands. The reviewer, who has extensive experience renovating a 1950s house and testing various paint brands, details the process and outcomes of using Lick paint in two rooms with different application methods and colors. The review outlines the key advantages and disadvantages of Lick paint. Pros include excellent coverage and finish, accurate color matching to samples, durability, thickness, self-priming properties, low volatile organic compound (VOC) content resulting in less odor, and a high-quality finish regardless of whether a brush, roller, or sprayer is used. The primary cons identified are its price point, which is higher than some popular DIY brands, and a more limited color palette compared to competitors. For testing, three different Lick paint hues (one dark, one medium, and one light) were applied. The paint was used on fresh plaster after mist-coating, and also on wooden wardrobes, a radiator, doors, and a tiled window sill. The application methods included paint brushes, rollers, and a paint gun to assess versatility. Initial impressions of Lick paint were positive, noting the well-protected packaging, the inclusion of a branded stir stick, and the paint's thick consistency and accurate color matching to expectations. When using a paint spray gun, a 20% dilution was empirically determined to be effective, providing good coverage with minimal drips and splatter. While a second coat was necessary to achieve a flawless finish and prevent the mist coat from showing through, this aligned with Lick's product description. The paint demonstrated significant coverage, exceeding expectations and allowing for painting of multiple surfaces within a room with leftover paint. A notable observation was the significantly reduced odor compared to cheaper, low-VOC mist-coat paints. For roller and brush application, Lick Green 01 (matt) was used on walls and White 03 (matt) on the ceiling. A single coat with a roller provided impressive coverage, almost appearing finished. However, a second coat was applied for consistency, especially on the built-in wardrobes, which were sprayed after light sanding and cleaning. The self-priming nature of the paint simplified the process, yielding a much-improved appearance. The paint exhibited fast drying times, although the recommended 2-4 hours between coats were adhered to. Durability was also a highlight, with the painted surfaces remaining unscratched even weeks after application in a busy household. The consistency between the sample stickers and the actual wall color was praised, addressing a common issue with other paint brands. The overall verdict is highly favorable, with the reviewer intending to use Lick paint for future renovations. While both spray gun and roller/brush methods delivered excellent finishes, the roller and paintbrush were found to offer better first-coat coverage. The higher price point is acknowledged but deemed justifiable for the paint's quality, durability, and finish. Lick paint typically costs £45 for 2.5L, with Pure Brilliant White 00 being an exception at £35 for 2.5L. This positions it as more affordable than luxury brands like Coat, Little Greene, and Farrow & Ball, but more expensive than mass-market options such as Dulux, GoodHome, and Valspar. Samples are available at £2 each or £1.60 for four or more. Lick paint is available directly from the Lick website, B&Q;, and Screwfix (LickPro for tradespeople). Alternatives like Coat paint are comparable in quality but pricier, while Dulux Trade Vinyl Matt offers a cheaper option worth considering. #LickPaintReview #HomeRenovation #PaintComparison #DIYHomeImprovement #InteriorPainting #PaintQuality #LowVOCPaint #ProductReview #LickPaintReview #HomeRenovation #PaintComparison #DIYHomeImprovement #InteriorPainting #PaintQuality #LowVOCPaint #ProductReview

10 months ago

Read Full Article